Sunday, November 30, 2008

The Constitution of the United States: is it well?

I am going to print the results from a survey/poll that I saw on THIRD EYE CONCEPT . You can access the site here, but I will include the bulk of the results as they were displayed so that you can see them here.
What I and you will read here got me to thinking. If folks don't really know (or care) about the
Law of the Land, The Founding Documents of the United States, The Bill of Rights,
well perhaps they need to be put before them so they can see exactly where they seem to be going. Which seems like away. For the next while, I am going to cite situations which explain, expose, or downright violate our God Given Rights as codified by the framers of our almost sacred Founding Documents: the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
So here we go. Obviously I'm not going to do all of this tonight, it will be a work in progress, and if you find something I should include, please forward it to me. Rights are being trampled so lets take a look at which ones and by whom.... shall we?


The Survey

A survey by the First Amendment Center in the US has reached the shocking conclusion that most American citizens don’t know the five basic freedoms enshrined in the constitution.

The study found that no more than 3% of Americans remember “petition” among the First Amendment’s five basic freedoms.

However, freedom of speech was remembered by the majority of respondents - 56%.

The others freedoms enshrined in the constitution appeared to have made little impression: freedom of religion was named by 15%; the same percentage remembered press freedom as a constitutional right while just 14% knew they had a right to assembly.

The number of respondents who remembered freedom of speech was the lowest in the history of the survey, conducted each year for the past eleven years.

What makes this year’s results more shocking is that 4 out of 10 people questioned could not name any freedom at all.

Whatever freedoms the constitution of the country may guarantee, it does not matter much since these rights are neither remembered nor needed as such.

The findings indicate that modern Americans do not think along the same lines as the Founders of the U.S.

Nowadays, it would seem, many Americans do not consider their basic rights and freedoms inalienable and are ready to delegate them to state or federal officials.

More than two centuries ago it did not take long for the Founders of the United States of America to realize the necessity of preserving individual freedoms in a system of individual states with a strong federal governmental centre.

In 1791, just four years after the declaration in 1787 of the American Constitution, the states adopted the First Amendment together with the Bill of Rights to guarantee that the strong federal government would not trample on basic individual rights and freedoms.

Moreover, there are rights totally forgotten by the American society, meaning most Americans are not familiar with the freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution.

Freedom of speech and religion are among the first but liberties introduced to the American Constitution by the Bill of Rights. Traditionally, most of the questioned Americans recalled them. But regarding freedom of the press, freedom to assemble and to petition - these seem to be lost in oblivion.

The annual State of the First Amendment survey, held by the First Amendment Center (www.firstamendmentcenter.org), questions adult Americans on their attitude towards the rights spelled out in the First Amendment. This year it found the following:

• 39% would extend to subscription cable and satellite television the government’s current authority to regulate content on over-the-air broadcast television.

• 54% would continue IRS regulations that bar religious leaders from openly endorsing political candidates from the pulpit without endangering the tax-exempt status of their organizations.

• 66% say the government should be able to require television broadcasters to offer an equal allotment of time to conservative and liberal broadcasters; 62% would apply that same requirement to newspapers, which never have had content regulated by the government.

• 38% would permit government to require broadcasters to report a specified amount of “positive news” in return for licenses to operate.

• 31% would not permit musicians to sing songs with lyrics that others might find offensive.

• 68% favor government restrictions on campaign contributions by private companies, and 55% favor such limits on amounts individuals can contribute to someone else’s campaign.

Thus, a large number of Americans concede that in specific cases the federal government can be involved or even control individual freedoms.

The most shocking conclusion of the survey was that most of Americans could not name the five basic freedoms enshrined in the constitution.

End of Survey

So, I would like to mention that the five basic freedoms are found in the FIRST AMENDMENT.

  • Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
  • or abridging the freedom of speech,
  • or of the press;
  • or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
  • and to petition the government for a redress of grievances
They are all in the First Amendment............Think about the news stories you have read in the last year, or seen on the television. Have you seen evidence of a "police state" in which these basics are not respected? Keep an eye out..........More next time

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Barack Obama forced to deny abandoning 'change' amid insider appointments

Barack Obama is just another politician. It is obvious now. This is a guy who spent 600 million plus dollars to get a job that pays 400k a year. He told anyone who would listen to him exactly what they wanted to hear. He played those who voted for him. Now, not everyone was willing to listen. Many people saw right through him. I think I am one of those people. I never believed a thing he said. I watched him, I listened to him. I was not impressed. I think I mentioned my lack of confidence in B.O. in prior posts. I didn't trust him then, I don't trust him now. As a matter of fact I trust him even less now.
He is the next President of the United States. We have Russian naval vessels off the coast of South America, we have Islamic murderers killing Western tourists in India. In three days B.O. has had three press conferences and he has not said a word about these things. Well.....what the hell is he waiting for? I'll tell you. Barack Obama is not Presidential material. He is beyond his capability. If you look at his record you will see that he is incapable of making a decision. He can't think on his feet. I'm not even sure he can think for himself. I base this on my observations of the President Elect. And he's not punctual. Obviously he has little regard for his peers. Oh, wait, of course, now, he has no peers, thanks to an uneducated and/or ignorant electorate, at least the majority of them.

What about Immigration?

Should our borders be closed? Should aliens in the US be entitled to benefits that US citizens are not able to receive? Why is our government not stopping illegal aliens from pouring through the borders? Are there really jobs that American Citizens not willing to do? If so, who was doing those jobs twenty years ago. Personally, when I was a teenager, I was picking rocks out of fields being prepared for agriculture.

HOW GOVERNMENT DISGUISES ITS AGENDA TO FOOL THE PEOPLE

Here is an interesting opinion column I came across.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Voters

Well, I just got back from a Central American country known for coffee and Contras. Talk about voter intimidation. Down there you can actually be beaten for voting the wrong way, unlike modern "intimidation" here in the States which amounts to a fairy tale for a biased media.
Oh, that reminds me, this is a must see. http://howobamagotelected.com/ When I first watched this I was horrified that these folks were actually voting. It didn't matter who they were voting for, it was their lack of knowledge and the inaccuracy of what they thought they knew. Now I really understand what Neil Boortz means when he refers to the "dumb masses". I knew what he meant, it's just that I had never seen such an example. It is also an example of biased media and the actual filter it uses to only present the information it wants you to see. Ah, here's another one about folks who don't know what's going on. http://beltwayblips.com/video/harlem_voters/
Is there some actual conspiracy at work here? I'm not sure about that, but it seems like it could be. Who is actually in charge of what is seen on the TV news, or in the pages of a newspaper or magazine. You may never see the whole truth unless you actually go out and find it. Even then you may be unable to get the real truth. Ever seen the movie "Wag the Dog"? It's about perception management. It's about the creation of truth, the selling of an idea. Much like Obama being sold to the public as an agent of change.
Have you been paying attention to his selections for the various posts in his administrations. Clintonistas, some of the folks who helped bring us this economic situation; will Bill Ayers be the new Secretary of Education? It's an interesting group. Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State. We will soon see what Obamas definition of change actually is. One group of voters will be surprised.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Oh Well

An unknown quantity has been elected. What do we really know about this man? Not much. What does he really stand for? I don't know. I don't think anyone really knows. I need to think about this....seriously.